Shintaro Mochizuki vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 02:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Mochizuki vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

JPN
0
Win
Played
2
Win

HKG
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 0 - 2 Wong
They have played 4 sets in total, with Shintaro Mochizuki winning 0 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 4. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Shintaro Mochizuki was at the Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati, 06-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mochizuki | 0 |
| Wong | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati(08-06-25)
(R2) Yokohama Challenger(11-21-24)
S. Mochizuki vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $967,880 | Career Prize Money | $538,970 |
| 54.36% (218-183) | Career Total W/L | 55.78% (164-130) |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 2 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 40.00% (4-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (5-6) |
S. Mochizuki vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Wong has secured 47.89% of points on their second serve, slightly surpassing Mochizuki's 44.46%.
- Return Game Stats: Although Wong's recent form shows winning 42.35% of opponents' second serve points, Mochizuki excels by achieving 48.11%. On first serve returns, Mochizuki again outperforms with 29.23% to Wong's 23.42%. Is Mochizuki's superior return game a deciding factor? Potentially, yes.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Wong has maintained better composure under pressure, saving 54.11% of breakpoints compared to Mochizuki's 50.4%. Could this resilience influence critical moments? Likely, yes.
- Performance Overview: In the past year, Mochizuki holds a higher win percentage with 58.9% (43-30), compared to Wong's 52% (39-36).
- Surface Preference: Wong is more successful on hard courts with a win rate of 59% while suffering on indoor hard surfaces at 43%. Mochizuki shines on grass with 58% but shares a weak point with Wong on indoor hard courts.
- Player Level: Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Mochizuki having a slightly higher win rate of 59.62% compared to Wong's 56%.
- Direct H2H Matches: Wong leads the head-to-head with a 1-0 record, securing victory in two sets in their previous encounter at the Yokohama Challenger on hard courts.
- Tiebreak and Pressure Situations: Wong has won the lone tiebreak they've contested, and their average match duration is approximately 1 hour and 39 minutes.
- Opponent Quality: Wong has faced stiffer competition with opponents averaging a rank of 230.97, compared to Mochizuki's average opponent rank of 243.92.
- Deciding Sets: In live match scenarios, both players boast robust records in deciding sets, with Mochizuki having a slight edge at 57% over Wong's 56%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Mochizuki has been more effective at converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 35.93% compared to Wong's 33.61%.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
This matchup reveals a keen battle between Wong and Mochizuki, with each possessing distinct advantages. Wong demonstrates a stronger second serve and resilience under pressure, which could be pivotal during critical moments of the match.
Mochizuki, on the other hand, has a defensive edge with a superior return game, potentially neutralizing Wong's serve advantage. Mochizuki's marginally better recent win record illustrates their overall consistency and capability in high-stakes scenarios.
Considering their head-to-head history and current playing conditions, while Wong has claimed their previous encounter decisively, Mochizuki's overall performance metrics and returning capabilities provide a compelling case for edging out a victory.
Based on comprehensive analysis, Mochizuki is slightly favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Mochizuki vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 18 | Games Won | 26 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:50:29 | Average Match Time | 1:50:29 |
| 47% (76/161) | 1st Serve % | 61% (94/153) |
| 66% (50/76) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (64/94) |
| 38% (32/85) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (10/21) |
| 42% (64/153) | Return Points Win % | 49% (79/161) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | ||
C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | ||
F | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||

S. Mochizuki vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.36% (218/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.78% (164/130) |
| 52.78% (503/450) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.07% (372/316) |
| 50.29% (4524/4472) | Games Win/Loss | 51.16% (3419/3264) |
| 54.91% (123/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.90% (129/90) |
| 57.55% (61/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.51% (20/23) |
| 40.00% (16/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (9/9) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 901 | Aces Total | 1687 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1665 | Total Double Faults | 603 |
| 1:41:55 | Average Match Time | 1:31:40 |
| 403.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 369.61 |
| 56% (15940/28372) | 1st Serve % | 60% (11331/18739) |
| 66% (10518/15940) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (8054/11331) |
| 47% (5837/12432) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3631/7408) |
| 44% (1412/3179) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (703/1718) |
| 42% (12144/28638) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7230/18830) |
| 60.61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 42.86% (9/12) | Masters W/L | 46.67% (7/8) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 38.46% (15/24) | Main Tour W/L | 27.27% (3/8) |
| 56.07% (120/94) | Challenger W/L | 55.65% (69/55) |
| 60.00% (54/36) | Futures W/L | 59.50% (72/49) |
| 54% (207/382) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (157/286) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 57% (66/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (56/102) |
| 54% (78/144) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/94) |
| 83% (209/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 16% (209/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/21) |
| 22% (192/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (137/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
